{"id":71291,"date":"2019-02-11T11:18:16","date_gmt":"2019-02-11T11:18:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/viconsortium.com\/?p=71291"},"modified":"2019-02-11T11:18:18","modified_gmt":"2019-02-11T11:18:18","slug":"bb-manufacturing-files-motion-to-hold-government-in-contempt-of-court-for-contravening-order-forbidding-the-collection-of-excise-taxes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?p=71291","title":{"rendered":"B&#038;B Manufacturing Files Motion To Hold Government In Contempt Of Court For Contravening Order Forbidding The Collection Of Excise Taxes"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>As the Government of the Virgin Islands continues to wait for a District Court ruling to determine the fate of the collection of excise taxes in the U.S. Virgin Islands &#8212; once a reliable source of tens of millions of dollars for the government&#8217;s coffers annually &#8212; it is facing yet another challenge in what has become one of the hottest cases in the District Court. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>B&amp;B Manufacturing, a St. Thomas-based firm that produces several roofing products, <a href=\"https:\/\/viconsortium.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/motion-for-order-to-show-cause-1.pdf\">filed a motion <\/a>asking the court to issue a show cause order why the G.V.I. shouldn&#8217;t be held in contempt of court for what B&amp;B argued was the contravening of the court&#8217;s order halting the collection of excise taxes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>B&amp;B staked its claim on the court&#8217;s November 15\u00a0order enjoining the government from \u201ccollecting excise taxes in a manner inconsistent with the Court\u2019s holding in its September 28, 2018, judgment; that is, the GVI is enjoined from collecting excise taxes in a manner that violates Commerce Clause principles; and it is further ordered that, to the extent it wishes to do so, the GVI may advise the court if and when it is prepared to collect excise taxes in a manner consistent with the court\u2019s September 28, 2018, judgment and memorandum opinion, at which point the court may reconsider the injunctive relief ordered herein.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The court&#8217;s original order came on September 28. However, the government continued to collect excise taxes claiming that the order did not specifically state that the Bureau of Internal Revenue was precluded from continuing its collection efforts. Yet even after the court&#8217;s November 15 order clarifying the matter, the government on November 21 issued a letter to on-island manufactures, including B&amp;B Manufacturing, stating that the G.V.I. would be collecting excise taxes effective December 1, 2018, moving unilaterally to lift a court-ordered injunction even before a decision on the matter was rendered.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cBeginning December 1, 2018, the government would like to start assessing excise taxes on locally manufactured goods. The excise taxes on locally manufactured goods will be due thirty days after the close of each month. Thus, the December tax return will be due and payable by January 30, 2019,&#8221; read the B.I.R.-issued letter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;One has to wonder why the defendants represented at the November 8 hearing \u201cthat developing and implementing a procedure for the collection of excise taxes on locally manufactured items was a difficult endeavor that would take a great deal of time,&#8221; but lo and behold by November 21 the B.I.R. had developed and implemented a fix to the problem,&#8221; B&amp;B said in its motion. \u00a0&#8220;This leads \u00a0to one of two mutually exclusive possibilities \u2013 (1) that the representations to the court were false (a contention the undersigned does not believe) or (2) that the new scheme has not fixed the problem (a more reasonable interpretation of the situation). But if the answer if the latter, then the court should not lift the injunction that is currently in force and effect and hold the defendants in contempt.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"The G.V.I. responded by contending that though it issued the letter to manufacturers, it has yet to resume the collection of excise taxes and therefore the plaintiff's motion was moot and should be ignored. It further stated that the letter was issued because the G.V.I. believed it would have been able to restart excise tax collection by Dec. 1, 2018. (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/viconsortium.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/02\/gvi-response-1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">The G.V.I. responded<\/a> by contending that though it issued the letter to manufacturers, it had yet to resume the collection of excise taxes and therefore the plaintiff&#8217;s motion was moot and should be ignored. It further stated that the letter was issued because the G.V.I. believed it would have been able to restart excise tax collection by Dec. 1, 2018.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;The government, in an effort to begin collecting excise taxes again, has been working diligently on implementing the proper steps to ensure the new tax structure will pass constitutional muster. As part of this effort, the government on or about November 21, 2018, issued letters (\u201cManufacturers Letter\u201d) to local manufacturers, including the intervenor, stating that the government would like to begin taxing on December 1, 2018. The manufacturers letter also set forth the date and time for several educational workshops to explain to local manufactures how to file and pay excise tax&#8230; Given\u00a0the court\u2019s injunction, the tax has not yet been assessed and the government has not resumed collection of excise taxes,&#8221; said the G.V.I. in its response.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The government&#8217;s decision to issue a letter notifying manufacturers of its intention to resume excise tax collection by December 1 shows how gravely the G.V.I. has underestimated the matter before the court, and further shows how badly the halt in excise tax collection has been hurting its bottomline; the G.V.I. is projected to lose $45 million annually if it can no longer collect excise taxes.\u00a0<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" aria-label=\"The government's decision to issue a letter notifying manufacturers of its intention to resume excise tax collection by December 1 shows how gravely the G.V.I. has underestimated the matter before the court, and further shows how badly the halt in excise tax collection has been hurting its bottomline. During a December interview with The Consortium, then-Governor-elect Albert Bryan was confident that the matter would have been resolved before he took office on January 7, 2019. &quot;Hopefully we\u2019ll be able to get this matter wrapped up before Governor Mapp leaves office,&quot; Mr. Bryan said.\u00a0 (opens in a new tab)\" href=\"https:\/\/viconsortium.com\/business\/territory-should-be-able-resume-collection-excise-tax-soon-bryan-says\/\" target=\"_blank\">During a December interview with The Consortium<\/a>, then-Governor-elect Albert Bryan was confident that the matter would have been resolved before he took office on January 7, 2019. &#8220;Hopefully we\u2019ll be able to get this matter wrapped up before Governor Mapp leaves office,&#8221; Mr. Bryan said.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The challenge was first brought by&nbsp;Reefco Services, Inc., a corporation organized in the USVI and engages in the marine refrigeration business, in December 2014. The company installs and provides repair services for refrigeration units, air conditioning units, ice markers, and water makers on boats.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Reefco, which was charged for equipment that it brought into the territory dating back to 2011, contended in its complaint that the taxes violated the&nbsp;Commerce Clause<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The complaint included five counts:&nbsp;Count one asserts a claim for an unconstitutional taking; count two asserts that the excise tax violates the Commerce Clause; count three asserts that the excise tax violates the Import\/Export Clause; count four asserts a claim for a refund of excise taxes paid; and count five also asserts a claim for an unconstitutional taking.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The District Court in 2015 granted the GVI a motion to dismiss, but only in part, while denying the motion to dismiss relative to counts four and five. In April 2017, however, the court moved to vacate the trial, settling the matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>But there was reconsideration this year of count two, according to court documents The Consortium has obtained. Count two contends that the excise tax law violates the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.&nbsp;\u201cThe excise tax is facially unconstitutional under the Commerce Clause as the excise tax discriminates against interstate commerce,\u201d reads a portion of count two. Citing precedent, the District Court said it was \u201cnecessary to reconsider its decision dismissing count two of the amended complaint and revive that count.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>According to the September 28 District Court judgement, Reefco was assessed excise taxes in accordance with 33 Virgin Islands Code,&nbsp;Section 42 for items that Reefco imported into the territory. Section 42 was passed by the Virgin Islands Legislature in 1959. The section says ostensibly, the law requires the payment of \u201can excise tax on all articles, goods, merchandise or commodities manufactured in or brought into the Virgin Islands for personal use\u201d or \u201cany business use or purpose,\u201d unless the items are \u201cspecially taxed, exempted or excluded.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 1984, the Virgin Islands amended Section 42 to require the payment of excise taxes on \u201call articles, goods, merchandise and commodities manufactured in or brought into or manufactured in the Virgin Islands.\u201d&nbsp;Section 42b outlined the procedure for collection of excise taxes on foreign imports, while 42c outlined the procedure for collection of excise taxes on domestic imports. However, no statutory provision exists outlining the procedures for the collection of excise taxes on locally manufactured goods. Instead, Section 42a directs the director of the Bureau of Internal Revenue to \u201cpromulgate rules concerning procedures for the valuation of goods and payment of excise taxes on items manufactured in the Virgin Islands.\u201d According to the District Court, \u201cSignificantly, however, such regulations were never promulgated.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a separate case cited as precedent in the Sept. 28 proceedings, an appeal to the Third Circuit Court in JDS Realty Corp. v. Gov\u2019t of Virgin Islands explained that \u201c[a] cardinal rule of Commerce Clause jurisprudence is that \u2018[n]o state, consistent with the Commerce clause, may impose a tax which discriminates against interstate commerce by providing a direct commercial advantage to local business.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cBy imposing a tax only on imported goods\u201d but not locally manufactured goods, the excise tax did just that, the Third Circuit said in its ruling of the&nbsp;JDS Realty Corp. v. Gov\u2019t of Virgin Islands matter.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The District Court\u2019s Sept. 28 ruling noted that the Third Circuit was \u201chard pressed to imagine a taxing scheme more patently violative of the Commerce Clause than [the excise taxes under Section 42].\u201d Accordingly, the Third Circuit held that, \u201cbecause the challenged excise tax ha[d] a discriminatory purpose and effect, it violate[d] the commerce clause,\u201d added the District Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Depending on the ruling when the new case is heard in the Third Circuit, the repercussions could be significant for the local government, which for years has been struggling with a structural deficit, and is in continuous need of funds to meet its obligations. A diminishing or complete rejection of the excise tax would force the government to look elsewhere to recoup those funds.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As the Government of the Virgin Islands continues to wait for a District Court ruling to determine the fate of the collection of excise taxes in the U.S. Virgin Islands &#8212; once a reliable source of tens of millions of dollars for the government&#8217;s coffers annually &#8212; it is facing yet another challenge in what [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":71302,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[3,11,191,2474,147],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>B&amp;B Manufacturing Files Motion To Hold Government In Contempt Of Court For Contravening Order Forbidding The Collection Of Excise Taxes - V.I. Consortium<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Find Virgin Islands new, opinion, politics, lifestyle, business and more\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?p=71291\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Ernice Gilbert\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?p=71291\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?p=71291\",\"name\":\"B&B Manufacturing Files Motion To Hold Government In Contempt Of Court For Contravening Order Forbidding The Collection Of Excise Taxes - V.I. Consortium\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2019-02-11T11:18:16+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-11T11:18:18+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d227a4a2478d096447391f7d05afcb51\"},\"description\":\"Find Virgin Islands new, opinion, politics, lifestyle, business and more\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?p=71291#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?p=71291\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?p=71291#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"B&#038;B Manufacturing Files Motion To Hold Government In Contempt Of Court For Contravening Order Forbidding The Collection Of Excise Taxes\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/\",\"name\":\"V.I. Consortium\",\"description\":\"Uniting the Caribbean\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d227a4a2478d096447391f7d05afcb51\",\"name\":\"Ernice Gilbert\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"http:\/\/2.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50e9900b9c4e146fd5fb7b811fb4a06e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"http:\/\/2.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50e9900b9c4e146fd5fb7b811fb4a06e?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Ernice Gilbert\"},\"description\":\"I wear many hats, I suppose, but the one which fits me best would be journalism, second to that would be radio personality, thirdly singer\/songwriter and down the line. I've been the Editor-In-Chief at my videogames website, Gamesthirst, for over 5 years, writing over 7,000 articles and more than 2 million words. I'm also very passionate about where I live, the United States Virgin Islands, and I'm intent on making it a better place by being resourceful and keeping our leaders honest. VI Consortium was birthed out of said desire, hopefully my efforts bear fruit. Reach me at ernice@viconsortium.com.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/ernicegilbert.com\/\"],\"url\":\"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?author=1\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"B&B Manufacturing Files Motion To Hold Government In Contempt Of Court For Contravening Order Forbidding The Collection Of Excise Taxes - V.I. Consortium","description":"Find Virgin Islands new, opinion, politics, lifestyle, business and more","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?p=71291","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Ernice Gilbert","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?p=71291","url":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?p=71291","name":"B&B Manufacturing Files Motion To Hold Government In Contempt Of Court For Contravening Order Forbidding The Collection Of Excise Taxes - V.I. Consortium","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-02-11T11:18:16+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-11T11:18:18+00:00","author":{"@id":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d227a4a2478d096447391f7d05afcb51"},"description":"Find Virgin Islands new, opinion, politics, lifestyle, business and more","breadcrumb":{"@id":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?p=71291#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?p=71291"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?p=71291#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"B&#038;B Manufacturing Files Motion To Hold Government In Contempt Of Court For Contravening Order Forbidding The Collection Of Excise Taxes"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/#website","url":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/","name":"V.I. Consortium","description":"Uniting the Caribbean","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/#\/schema\/person\/d227a4a2478d096447391f7d05afcb51","name":"Ernice Gilbert","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"http:\/\/2.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50e9900b9c4e146fd5fb7b811fb4a06e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"http:\/\/2.gravatar.com\/avatar\/50e9900b9c4e146fd5fb7b811fb4a06e?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Ernice Gilbert"},"description":"I wear many hats, I suppose, but the one which fits me best would be journalism, second to that would be radio personality, thirdly singer\/songwriter and down the line. I've been the Editor-In-Chief at my videogames website, Gamesthirst, for over 5 years, writing over 7,000 articles and more than 2 million words. I'm also very passionate about where I live, the United States Virgin Islands, and I'm intent on making it a better place by being resourceful and keeping our leaders honest. VI Consortium was birthed out of said desire, hopefully my efforts bear fruit. Reach me at ernice@viconsortium.com.","sameAs":["http:\/\/ernicegilbert.com\/"],"url":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/?author=1"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71291"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=71291"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71291\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":71304,"href":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/71291\/revisions\/71304"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/71302"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=71291"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=71291"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/wp.viconsortium.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=71291"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}